Share your experience with the founderhere!

Nishil Patel
Jun 25, 2026
5 min read
Last Updated Jun 25, 2026
In this article, we’ve included real examples of a bad bug report and explained why they slow down your whole team. Plus, it covers exactly what a good bug report should look like to make sure bugs get fixed fast without any back-and-forth.
1.
Introduction
2.
Quick Overview: Bad Bug Report vs. Good Bug Report
3.
What Does a Bad Bug Report Look Like (And How to Make it Right!)
4.
FAQs
Testing software is hard work. It has only become harder today, especially when “vibe coding” is a thing and new apps or updates ship at breakneck speed. However, bugs ship just as fast. And, for a quality assurance professional or a PM, nothing feels more maddening than spotting a critical bug, reporting it, and then hearing back from developers: “I can’t reproduce this. What does that even mean? It doesn’t have enough info”.
A bad bug report wastes everyone’s time, causes delays, and may leave team members in disarray during follow ups, bug triage meetings, or sprint retrospectives. Luckily, writing effective bug reports is just about following a simple format with a few tweaks that works unequivocally.
Also Read: Bug Tracking Metrics: What to Measure and Why they Matter?
Before moving ahead with the granular details and examples, here’s a quick summary table for it.
| Bug Report Element | ✖️ Bad Bug Report | ✔️ Good Bug Report |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Proof | "The alignment is weird on the right side" | Attached: checkout_alignment_bug.mp4 (with the misaligned area highlighted in a red box). |
| Title | "Login is not working" | "Login Page Error: 'Sign In' button returns 500 Error when using Google SSO" |
| Steps to Reproduce | "Tried to buy a shirt and the cart emptied itself. Please fix ASAP" | 1. Go to www.xyz.com/shop. 2. Add 'T-Shirt' to cart. 3. Click 'Go to Cart'. Expected: Cart shows 1 item. Actual: Cart is empty. |
| System and Environment | “I’m using a Mac” | Device: MacBook Pro M2 | OS: macOS 14.2 | Browser: Chrome v120 | Env: Staging (Build #442) |
| Technical Context | None provided | Console: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'id') User State: Teams Account (User ID: #9932) |
| Bug Atomicity | "The header overlaps the video, the video has no sound, and the footer links 404s" | Ticket 1: Header overlaps video container, (Footer and Sound issues separated into Tickets 2 and 3). |
Here, we’ve drilled down on the parts of a typical bug report that might throw a developer off guard after receiving it for debugging. Plus, it covers examples and steps to how to make them right.
A bug report with missing or unannotated visual proof forces the developer to scour through text to guess what the screen looks like. And this doesn’t do a favor to anyone.
A bad bug report often starts with a lazy title. If a developer looks at a title and has no idea what part of the app is broken, there’s a pretty good chance that the bug report gets outright rejected. Or it may remain buried in the backlogs there until someone accidently stumbles on it or not.
A good title instantly tells the developer exactly what is wrong in one sentence.
The Good Example: "Checkout Page: 'Pay Now' button freezes the screen when using a Visa card."
If developers cannot reproduce the bug on their own system, they just cannot fix it. A bad report just says what went wrong, but not how to reproduce it with clarity and complete context.
Writing a numbered list works best. Here’s how:
Expected Result: It should take me to the user dashboard.
Actual Result: A blank white screen appears with a "500 Error" text.
Also Read: What are the Key Challenges in Bug Reporting Workflows (And How to Tackle Them)?
While documenting a bug, there may be cases when the error shows on the reporter’s computer but the same feature/function works perfectly fine on the developer's system. Why? Because the reporter might be using browsers or phones different from the one used by developers. A bad report leaves these details out. Or worse. It may not contain all the critical info required for fixing.
What works best is to list out your setup at the bottom of your report.
Also Read: What are the Most Common Challenges in Debugging (with Examples)?
While visual proof shows a developer what broke on the screen, technical logs show them why it broke behind the scenes. A bad report expects the developer to guess what the server or browser was doing at the time of the crash.
Pro Tip: For complex API bugs, what works best is to export and attach a HAR (HTTP Archive) file.
Also Read: How to Easily Download and Share Chrome Console Logs for Bug Reporting?
Software behaves differently depending on exactly where and how it is running. A report that just says "iOS 17" is good, but missing the app version or the specific user state can still lead to a "works on my machine" response.
Not all bugs happen 100% of the time, and not all bugs are showstoppers. A bad report leaves the developer and PM guessing how urgently the bug needs to be fixed and how hard it will be to reproduce.
Sometimes QA may find multiple bugs on the same page and put them all in one big ticket to save time. And this can be a nightmare for PMs and developers to handle.
It's best to stick to the golden rule: One Bug = One Ticket.
Nishil is a successful serial entrepreneur. He has more than a decade of experience in the software industry. He advocates for a culture of excellence in every software product.
Meet the Author: Nishil Patel, CEO, and Co-founder of BetterBugs. With a passion for innovation and a mission to improve software quality.
We never spam.