Dec 12, 2023
4 min read
Agile is naturally beneficial for QA engineers. And why not? Agile testing offers them the flexibility to work on testing a product step-wise, iteratively, continually, and with better collaboration.
Table of Content
Let’s start on the subject of Agile with a common question. What exactly does “agile” mean?
To be able to move quickly. Right?
We all like things this way. The same is true while testing software. There is nothing to not like about it and it's for good reasons.
Okay. Taking it to a somewhat less abstract route. Agile is very effective in major areas while developing and testing software.
Since we are on the subject of testing, it’s naturally beneficial for QA engineers. And why not? Agile testing offers them the flexibility to work on testing a product step-wise, iteratively, continually, and with better collaboration.
What about the results?
To name some it helps to make sure everything works right breaking the gigantic testing process into small parts. Feedback can be taken into consideration, whether it’s by the stakeholders or the customers. Defects can be fixed with speed for improved performance and better test coverage.
Since agile lets them push updates continuously, quality is barely compromised.
In short, unlike the waterfall methods, where everything is expected to be tested when the development cycle ends, agile helps QA engineers take testing to the next level.
Let’s take a snapshot view of the post and look at what we will cover:
As the technologies improved, so did the ways to provide solutions using them. The complexity of development increased, and so did making sure of its quality.
Waterfall methods of development and testing made the software lifecycle somewhat cumbersome.
What are we talking about? Well, meeting deadlines and making sure everything was polished in software became a pain.
Sure, everything in the waterfall was pre-defined. But what about the bugs and issues? Can we put a fixed number of it? Yes, QA best practices were used in development.
But that does not make the QA teams skip anything. Not if you want quality software.
The result? QA engineers reported bugs to developers but with a constraint. Everything had to be done after the development was completed. This led to messy situations, especially between the QA engineers and the developers.
There is no one at fault here. QA teams are doing their job and so are the developers. No one likes re-works. So what’s the problem and what’s the best possible solution?
No prizes for guessing here. Waterfall was problematic and Agile is here to provide ways to make life easier for all.
BetterBugs is developed to meet the agile testing needs of your project. It provides easy and quick ways to report issues to the developers making it an absolute delight to use with your agile workflows.
Now that we have set the tone for agile testing, let’s walk through some ways with QA best practices to make it even more effective.
The TDD approach uses the concept of writing tests before the development team finishes writing the source code. This approach aligns beautifully with the agile methods.
The written code had to eventually pass the tests to move forward. The failed test cases can be rectified then and there along with the development. This makes for a robust product. Following an iterative process through agile makes it even more focused on quality.
Another key to a quality product is the documentation part. TDD pushes this idea to practical usage. The scenarios, expected and obtained results, and the fulfillment of business requirements go hand-in-hand with the systematic approach of documenting everything.
Waterfall methods had this idea of bringing the QA teams when the development concluded. Agile is very good for changing this way. QA engineers need to be included from the very beginning of the project.
Agile is built for it. This also lets the QA members sink in deep with the core of a project.
Whether it’s the design, development, and deployment processes. Stakeholders, developers, and other key people can be on the same page with the QA team making the testing process more effective in every possible way.
It is hard not to include automation tools in some ways with the manual testing processes. Agile is good at this too. Unlike waterfall methods, where the QA teams had a lot to take in at the very end, automation also becomes difficult to implement.
With the inclusion of DevOps tools and the idea of continuous integration, it’s way easier to adjust the scope of tests.
Repetitive and complex tasks can be decided and implemented during sprint planning. Let’s look at some major takeaways that can be considered as QA best practices to include automated tests while agile testing:
This goes without saying that the tools and resources for the QA teams also is a big part of quality projects. Project management tools like Jira, Slack, and similar others can help with that. This promotes collaboration among team members.
Agile regards this as one of the main principles for its existence. Clear bug reports and tracking mechanisms serve as important pillars for product success.
Agile methods are adopted for many reasons. The feedback mechanism in agile is one of those. Testing software in Agile is not only to ensure quality but also to improve continually.
Sprint planning and getting updates on it involves the stakeholders, teams, and other key people. This allows for getting feedback on the ongoing project. The users are prioritized in Agile as well.
Based on the feedback, the changes or modifications are applied. QA engineers also make sure that the software works as expected.
Some key areas where QA engineers should keep an eye as QA best practices while testing include:
The research and development team of BetterBugs has closely funneled every bit of information and analyzed them to design the tool. Just like the agile methods offering complete flexibility in development and testing cycles, it gels up with the concept of bug reporting and debugging workflows.
Reporting issues to developers by QA teams while testing and validating software is a major and expensive task.
Yes, agile does provide many ways to make QA processes and methods very effective, but the time-consuming process of reporting and resolving bugs cannot be overlooked.
The flaws of traditional bug-reporting mechanisms are addressed through simple and effective flows in BetterBugs.
I hope you enjoyed reading the post and don’t forget to try it out as a Google Chrome Free Extension.
See you again with more and new insights.